Well, it seems like every week there's a new headline about AI and some new product or company implementing it into their services. This past week, Adobe angered all the professional creatives and hobbyists alike who use their products by updating their Terms of Service. The new terms appeared to grant Adobe the right to access and use user-generated content, including sensitive and NDA-protected material, for purposes such as training AI models. This sparked outrage among users who felt that their privacy and creative autonomy were being compromised.
Alongside these announcements, millions of sponsored voices spread across the internet and social media, promoting these products and companies because they’ve cashed a check. But amidst all the noise, it’s easy to lose sight of what AI truly is and what it can actually do.
Given the broad and multifaceted nature of AI, this article is just the beginning of a multi-part series. In this first part, we will focus on the impact of AI on creativity and the broader implications for the creative industries. Future articles will delve into other aspects of AI and its impact, exploring areas such as privacy, employment, ethics, and more.
This series aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of AI, its potential, and its challenges, helping you stay informed and prepared for the evolving technological landscape, from a creative perspective.
With that said, let’s take a step back and establish a solid foundation on AI. This will help us all make more informed decisions, especially in our creative businesses and artistic pursuits. Understanding AI in general terms can unlock new potentials and clarify the realities behind the hype. While this article won't list everything AI is capable of, it will provide a basic understanding and delve into the deeper implications of its integration into creative fields.
Most intriguingly, we will explore the connections I've discovered, suggesting a possible suppression of art through AI and the broader implications of such a trend.
What is AI?
Basic Definition
Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines that are programmed to think, learn, and adapt. These systems are designed to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and language translation.
Key Components
To understand AI better, let's break down some of its fundamental components:
Machine Learning (ML): This is a subset of AI that enables computers to learn from and make predictions based on data. ML algorithms identify patterns in data and improve their performance over time without being explicitly programmed for each task. An example is a recommendation system that suggests products based on past user behavior.
Neural Networks: These are computing systems inspired by the human brain's network of neurons. Neural networks consist of layers of interconnected nodes, or "neurons," that process data. They are particularly effective for tasks like image and speech recognition. For instance, neural networks are behind the facial recognition features in smartphones.
Deep Learning: A more advanced subset of machine learning, deep learning utilizes multi-layered neural networks to analyze various factors of data. It excels in tasks such as natural language processing and autonomous driving. Deep learning algorithms power sophisticated AI applications like self-driving cars and voice assistants.
Example
Imagine you have a smart home system. Initially, it requires manual setup for preferences such as lighting, temperature, and security settings. However, over time, it begins to learn your routines and preferences through machine learning. By analyzing data on your habits, the system can automatically adjust settings to optimize comfort and energy efficiency, without requiring further manual input. This adaptability and continuous improvement illustrate the essence of AI.
The Public Perception
So, this is what is sold to the public, pushed by spokespersons and influencers of companies who keep preaching about making grocery shopping easier, improving convenience, and enhancing daily life. These advancements are often marketed as the ultimate solutions to modern-day problems, painting a picture of a future where AI seamlessly integrates into every aspect of our lives.
While the public perception of AI focuses on convenience and improved daily life, there are deeper, more concerning implications that we need to address.
Reality Check
However, this is just one side of the coin. The real power and potential of AI are never promoted and go far beyond these convenient applications that are slowly training you to lose touch with reality. Here’s a deeper look into the capabilities and implications of AI on our creative industry.
While it's clear that AI offers numerous conveniences, there are underlying issues that raise significant concerns. Let’s delve into some of these critical concerns that highlight the darker side of AI's rapid advancement.
Critical Concerns
Do you find it odd that the first major roll-out of AI technology to the public mostly includes tools that disrupt and affect creative industries? We have global issues like economic exploitation and environmental damage, yet the cutting-edge technology isn't being used to address these. Instead, it's being used to strip the soul out of the arts and to learn your purchasing habits. This misalignment in priorities raises important questions.
Shouldn't AI be focused on replacing dangerous and dehumanizing jobs, or providing solutions to human rights issues? Instead, we're overly concerned with creating fake realities and altering our perceptions. This stark contrast highlights potential misdirection or even intentional social engineering, with a larger play to come years down the line.
These concerns lead us to a broader question about AI’s true purpose. Is AI genuinely designed to benefit society, or are there more commercial and controlling motives at play?
Despite these concerns, AI also holds the potential to revolutionize various fields positively. From advancing healthcare with personalized medicine to enhancing education through adaptive learning technologies, AI can significantly benefit society if directed towards meaningful and ethical purposes.
Is AI Really Here to Help, or Just to Sell and Control?
Adding to the critical concerns, one must question whether AI is genuinely designed to help society or if it's merely a tool to sell more products, reduce corporate labor costs, and increase profits. The focus on convenience and commercial gain often overshadows the potential for AI to address more significant societal issues. Furthermore, AI's extensive data collection capabilities allow for sophisticated behavioral profiling and control, which can be used to influence and manipulate human behavior.
Is that the ultimate end goal, to try and control all aspects of life by making people so dependent on technology that they can't function without it?
Among these concerns, a particularly troubling trend is the focus on creative industries. Why are these fields being targeted, and what does it mean for the future of human creativity?
Why Target the Creative Industries?
AI has been prominently introduced in areas such as art, music, photography, and other professional areas of creation. These applications, while impressive, often spark debates about the loss of human touch and the potential for widespread job displacement in creative fields. The allure of automating creativity—something deeply human and soulful—raises significant ethical and philosophical questions.
Historical Context: Art and Political Control
Interestingly, this isn't the first time we've seen powerful entities manipulate the arts for broader agendas. During the Cold War, the US government, through the CIA, covertly funded and promoted certain art movements like Expressionism to counter Soviet propaganda and promote American cultural values. This initiative was part of a larger strategy to influence public perception and political thought through cultural means. The underlying motive was to present American culture as sophisticated and forward-thinking, thereby countering the narrative that America was a cultural desert compared to the Soviet Union.
By controlling and promoting certain art movements, the US government aimed to shape societal values and prevent the arts from becoming a rallying point for political opposition. This was a lesson learned from observing the power of the arts in other countries, where art had been a catalyst for radical political change. For example, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was heavily influenced by avant-garde art movements that challenged the status quo and inspired revolutionary ideas.
Another example is during the early 20th century, when the German Bauhaus movement was known for its radical approach to art, architecture, and design, emphasizing functionality and breaking away from traditional forms. The Nazi regime saw the potential of the Bauhaus to inspire dissent and quickly moved to suppress it. The Bauhaus was closed in 1933, and many of its artists fled Germany, spreading their innovative ideas worldwide. This historical precedent underscores the power of art to inspire significant societal changes and the lengths to which regimes will go to control it.
Back then, artists boldly stood for something, challenging societal norms and risking everything to inspire change. Their work was a powerful form of resistance and expression, deeply intertwined with the social and political movements of their time. In contrast, much of what we consider "art" in modern times is often created for algorithms, with creators metaphorically dancing for likes and views. This shift from creating with a purpose to creating for popularity might not be a mere consequence of technology but part of a broader design.
By promoting and rewarding art that conforms to algorithmic preferences, powerful entities can subtly guide the direction of creative expression. This not only commodifies creativity but also suppresses its potential to challenge and inspire profound societal changes. The focus on popularity metrics and social media engagement can dilute the essence of art, transforming it from a medium of radical expression to a tool for maintaining the status quo.
Is this shift part of a larger strategy to control and commercialize human creativity, making it more predictable and less radical? By commodifying creativity, are we inadvertently suppressing the potential for art to challenge and inspire profound societal changes? The rollout of AI, while often framed as technological progress, might be part of a larger strategy to influence and control.
After World War II, many top Nazis fled had integrated into governments and institutions around the world, including the United States. Operation Paperclip, for instance, saw former Nazi scientists and engineers brought to the U.S. to innovate various programs, including aerospace and weapons development. This influx of individuals with authoritarian ideologies into influential positions adds another layer to the understanding of how governments might seek to control cultural narratives and suppress radical artistic movements.
Additionally, it is important to note the extensive influence of the Pentagon and CIA on Hollywood movies. The Pentagon has been involved in more than 2,500 productions since the establishment of its Hollywood liaison office in the late 1940s. The CIA has also influenced numerous film and TV projects, sometimes altering scripts to portray the agency favorably or to push certain narratives. This relationship between the U.S. government and Hollywood has allowed for significant control over the cultural narratives presented to the public, often serving as a form of propaganda to promote military and political agendas.
Moreover, the development of the internet has deep roots in military research. The internet originated from the ARPANET project funded by the U.S. Department of Defense in the late 1960s, aimed at creating a robust, fault-tolerant communication system. Similarly, CERN played a crucial role in the creation of the World Wide Web, primarily for scientific collaboration. This foundational involvement of military and scientific institutions in creating the Internet adds another layer to the understanding of how technology can be used to influence and control information flow and public perception.
This historical context raises questions about the current focus of AI development and deployment. Is the early emphasis on creative tools a way to control and commercialize human creativity, making it more predictable and less radical?
By commodifying creativity, are we inadvertently suppressing the potential for art to challenge and inspire profound societal changes? The way the rollout is happening makes things seem odd because the overall creative communities will lose work, be replaced, etc. Many will argue that it's just technological progress, but there is always a grand architect to everything. This raises further concerns about the motives behind these technological advancements and where the current attention of the masses is focused.
Hypothetical Scenario: The AI Art Monopoly
Imagine a near future where a major corporation, leveraging advanced AI technologies, has successfully developed a suite of creative tools that dominate the market. These tools can generate artwork, music, literature, and even film scripts with a few clicks, producing high-quality content that mimics the styles of well-known artists and creators. Initially, these tools are marketed as aids to help artists streamline their workflow and boost productivity.
However, as the AI tools improve, they begin to surpass human creators in terms of speed, efficiency, and even creativity, as judged by mainstream standards. The corporation behind these tools, let's call it "CreativeCorp," starts to acquire exclusive contracts with major entertainment and publishing companies, promising to deliver content faster and cheaper than any human artist could.
Impact on Individual Creatives
Artists, musicians, writers, and filmmakers find themselves increasingly marginalized. Independent creators struggle to compete with the low-cost, high-output AI-generated content. Galleries, publishers, and studios prefer to work with CreativeCorp because it guarantees a steady stream of commercially viable content without the unpredictability associated with human artists.
Creative Autonomy and Control
As CreativeCorp's influence grows, it begins to subtly shape the kind of content that is produced. The AI algorithms are designed to favor certain themes, styles, and narratives that are deemed safe, popular, and profitable. Experimental, controversial, or subversive art that challenges societal norms becomes rarer as the AI filters out these elements to align with market trends and corporate interests.
Cultural Homogenization
The result is a homogenization of culture. The diversity of voices, styles, and perspectives that once characterized the creative industry is replaced by a bland, formulaic output tailored to maximize engagement and profitability. Over the years, AI-generated content dominates social media and streaming platforms, capturing the attention and tastes of the masses through a gradual process of indoctrination. Audiences are subtly trained to prefer this type of content, as algorithms consistently promote corporate-backed projects. Meanwhile, human creators find it increasingly difficult to gain visibility and recognition, further entrenching the dominance of AI-generated art.
Social Media and Corporate Alliances
Further complicating this scenario, social media platforms strike deals with corporations like CreativeCorp. These deals involve significant payments to promote AI-generated projects and content. As a result, the algorithms of these platforms are fine-tuned to prioritize and showcase this AI-generated content, subtly training users on what to like and engage with. This manipulation happens subconsciously, as users are consistently exposed to a curated feed that emphasizes corporate-backed projects over independent, human-created art.
Long-Term Consequences
Over time, the suppression of radical and innovative art leads to a stagnation of cultural and intellectual growth. Society loses a crucial avenue for critical reflection and emotional expression. The arts, which have historically played a vital role in driving social change and fostering empathy, are reduced to mere commodities.
In this scenario, the commodification of creativity through AI doesn't just replace human artists—it reshapes the entire cultural landscape, prioritizing profit over profound societal change. It highlights the potential dangers of allowing powerful entities to control and direct the flow of creative expression.
This vivid scenario underscores the importance of maintaining a balance between technological advancement and the preservation of human creativity. While AI can offer incredible tools for enhancing artistic endeavors, it is crucial to ensure that these tools are used to support, rather than supplant, the diverse and unpredictable nature of human creativity. Ironically, the very tools and corporations that creative professionals are promoting today in the name of progress are the same ones that most likely will replace them or their children in the future within the creative arts.
Conclusion
So, how does this all tie into what we initially set out to discuss, which is AI? Well, the historical manipulation of art and media by powerful entities offers a critical lens through which to view the current development and deployment of AI. The patterns of control, influence, and commodification seen in the past are echoed in the ways AI is being integrated into creative industries today, seemingly above everything else.
From the covert promotion of Expressionism during the Cold War to the Pentagon and CIA's involvement in Hollywood, we see a consistent effort to shape cultural narratives. The development of the internet, with its deep roots in military research, further underscores how technological advancements can be driven by broader agendas.
In this context, the focus on AI tools for creative industries raises significant concerns. Is the emphasis on these tools a way to control and commercialize human creativity, making it more predictable and less radical? By commodifying creativity, are we suppressing the potential for art to challenge and inspire profound societal changes? The rollout of AI, while often framed as technological progress, might be part of a larger strategy to influence and control.
The Artificial Intelligence rollout could have easily been directed toward addressing global issues, clearly demonstrating the intellectual power and benefits for humanity by solving problematic areas, but instead, we were treated like children who got new toys to play around with like editing tools for altering reality and deepfake videos.
However, it's not all negative. Understanding these dynamics is crucial not only for our creative endeavors but for society as a whole. Being aware of how AI and other technologies are used allows us to harness their potential for good. These tools can be leveraged to create more equitable, just, and inspiring outcomes. By staying informed and critical, we can ensure that these powerful technologies serve humanity's best interests.
As we continue this series, we will delve deeper into the various facets of AI, exploring its implications on privacy, employment, ethics, and more. By understanding the broader historical and societal context, we can better navigate the evolving landscape of AI and make more informed decisions in our creative and professional lives. Together, we can use these insights to foster a more thoughtful, conscious, and ethical approach to technology.
Stay tuned for the next installment, where we will further unpack the complexities of AI and its far-reaching impacts, and explore how we can collectively guide these innovations towards a more positive and inclusive future.
Feeling good and ready to execute? Let's get started on your next photography project.
Click the link above to begin!
