Step 1: Take Away the Gimmicks
Picture your latest creative project. Maybe it’s a photo series, a film concept, a marketing campaign, or a brand identity. Now, strip it down.
Remove the shock value. No blood, no glitch effects, and no played-out Renaissance costumes.
Remove the sad music and cinematic lighting. No atmospheric tricks to tell people how to feel.
Remove AI assistance, filters, and tech-driven aesthetics. No generative prompts doing the work for you.
Remove the trauma branding. No “I suffered, therefore this is art” pass.
What’s left?
If your project still holds weight, if there’s still a core idea that resonates, congratulations, you’ve created something real.
But if the whole thing collapses under its own aesthetic, you may have just diagnosed yourself with the false depth crisis.
Step 2: Are You Creating or Just Producing?
Let’s do another test:
If you had to describe your project without mentioning its aesthetics, could you do it?
If you stripped away the trendy visuals and references, would there still be a compelling idea underneath?
If someone else made something with the same themes but executed it differently, would your version still stand out?
Now, let’s talk about why this matters.
Welcome to the Era of Passable Creativity
We live in a time where it has never been easier to create, yet never harder to create something original.
Technology makes creativity feel effortless, but effort was always part of the process.
AI, filters, and templates allow anyone to generate an aesthetic.
You don’t need to understand composition, lighting, or storytelling anymore. You just need to know what looks cool.
Creativity, once an act of discovery, is now an act of assembly.
People confuse the look of originality with actual originality.
If something resembles great work, it’s assumed to be great.
But originality isn’t about surface, it’s about perspective. And if everyone is pulling from the same toolkits, the work starts to blur together.
Trauma Has Become a Creative Safety Net
Pain can be fuel for art, but it’s not a substitute for depth.
Today, trauma is often used as an automatic pass. If a project is labeled as personal pain, people feel they can’t critique it.
But art isn’t just about expressing pain, it’s about shaping it into something meaningful.
Otherwise, we end up with a cycle of performative suffering, where personal wounds become aesthetic choices rather than artistic convictions.
This is why so much work today is passable; it looks the part, but it doesn’t hold weight.
Are You Mistaking Polish for Vision?
Polished visuals and heavy themes can’t carry weak ideas.
A well-lit, cinematic shot doesn’t make a film profound.
A Renaissance-style portrait doesn’t make it a commentary on classical art.
A traumatic backstory doesn’t automatically make a story meaningful.
Polish is the wrapping. Vision is the message.
And if your work only works because of its polish, what happens when you strip it down?
Step 3: The False Equivalency Between Output and Artistic Vision
Let’s do another test:
If you stripped away your visuals and aesthetics, could you still explain why your project exists?
If someone asked what your work means, beyond looking cool or different, would you have an answer?
If you removed yourself from the performance of being a “creative,” would you still know why you’re making art?
The Illusion of Creativity: Why Performance Has Replaced Meaning
We’re in an era where people aren’t just making art, they’re performing creativity.
It’s not about why you create. It’s about appearing creative.
It’s not about insight. It’s about aesthetics that look like insight.
It’s not about ideas. It’s about output.
This is why modern creativity feels hollow. People are skipping the meaning and jumping straight to the performance.
Why? Because meaning takes time. Performance is instant.
Performance gets likes. Depth requires patience.
Performance makes you seem interesting. Depth demands you be interesting.
Performance lets you avoid self-reflection. Depth forces you to ask the hard questions.
This is how we ended up with passable creativity flooding the landscape.
The Renaissance photoshoot isn’t about art history. It’s about looking conceptual.
The AI-glitch aesthetic isn’t about technology’s impact. It’s about imitating a trend.
The trauma piece isn’t about processing or understanding pain. It’s about packaging it as a brand.
What’s missing? The why.
The Modern Creative Trap: When Depth Gets Replaced by Demand
The filmmaker who once prioritized storytelling now settles for cinematic aesthetics over substance.
The photographer who used to explore ideas now builds their shoots around trends, hoping the meaning will follow.
It’s not just a social media problem; even those who resist trends feel the pressure to “keep up.”
Because today, people expect output.
Audiences expect artists to always be producing.
Clients expect a faster turnaround, not deeper thinking.
The industry favors visibility over substance.
And so, even artists who once cared deeply about their work start making things just to have something to show.
But output without meaning is just noise.
The Hard Truth: Are You Creating or Just Keeping Up?
Ask yourself:
Do you make things because you have something to say or because you need to post?
Do your ideas come from curiosity and exploration or from external pressure to stay relevant?
If you couldn’t show your work to anyone, would you still want to make it?
The difference between real originality and passable creativity is simple:
The first one starts with why.
The second one starts with how it looks.
Originality isn’t about making more, it’s about making something with weight.
Maybe slowing down isn’t falling behind. Maybe it’s the only way to make something that actually matters.
Step 4: Are We Just Acting?
Let’s do another test:
If you had to describe your artistic voice, could you do it without referencing aesthetics?
If you took away the visuals, the medium, and the themes, what remains that is uniquely you?
If you couldn’t use your usual tricks, would your work still feel like yours?
The Aesthetic Identity Crisis
At some point, people stopped creating from who they are and started creating based on who they want to appear to be.
They don’t explore ideas; they adopt aesthetics that make them seem interesting.
They don’t create from experience; they borrow moods, themes, and references that already look “artistic.”
They aren’t building a personal voice; they are playing a role.
And the real danger? Most people don’t even realize they’re doing it.
The person who makes "haunting" work but isn't actually haunted.
The person who builds their entire identity around being an “edgy” artist but has no real philosophy driving it.
The person who keeps returning to trauma in their work, not because they’re still healing, but because they know it sells.
What happens when the act falls apart?
The Difference Between Adopting and Embodying
Art that lasts isn’t built on borrowed aesthetics. It comes from lived ideas, real perspectives, and conviction.
You can imitate depth, but if you don’t connect to what you’re trying to express, your work will always feel hollow.
You can follow trends in conceptual photography, glitch art, or brutalist design, but if you don’t have a real reason for using them, you’re just playing dress-up.
You can use themes of isolation, existentialism, or human suffering, but if you’re only using them because they look or sound profound, without any real connection to what they mean, you’re not saying anything new.
And that’s the difference: Art that holds weight comes from those who don’t just collect ideas; they have something real to say.
The Hard Truth: Do You Actually Live Your Work?
Ask yourself:
Do you create based on your actual thoughts and beliefs or because you think it will make you look a certain way?
If you stripped away the surface elements, would your work still be recognizable as yours?
Is your work a reflection of your mind or just an aesthetic arrangement of ideas you’ve borrowed?
At some point, you have to decide:
Are you creating something real, or are you just acting?
Because style without substance is just performance. And performance doesn’t last.
Step 5: The Challenge. Create Without a Safety Net
Let’s take this one step further. Imagine your next project. But this time, you’re not allowed to lean on the usual safety nets.
No using shock value as a substitute for substance.
No throwing in deep-sounding themes just to make it seem important.
No mimicking the look of a great idea instead of having one.
No using trauma as an automatic “get out of critique” card.
Just you and your rawest, most unfiltered thoughts.
What would you make? Would it still hold up? Or would you feel lost without the aesthetic armor?
This is the Test of True Originality
If you had to create something that only you could create, would you be able to?
No trend-hopping.
No borrowing moods from other artists.
No assembling familiar visuals and calling it vision.
Just a concept so deeply yours that no one else could have made it.
Because that’s what originality is. Not just looking different but creating from a place no one else can access.
Can You Do It?
If the idea of stripping away all the creative padding makes you uncomfortable, that’s a good sign.
Maybe it means you’ve been relying on aesthetics more than ideas.
Maybe it means you’ve never had to work without the safety of trends.
Maybe it means you’ve been assembling, not creating.
And maybe… It’s time to change that.
Because the future of originality doesn’t belong to those who can generate aesthetic distractions.
It belongs to those who can create work that holds weight, even when all the gimmicks are stripped away.
Final Thoughts: Why This Matters
So, where does this leave us?
We’re surrounded by content more than ever before. Creativity has never been more accessible, but real originality has never been more at risk. It’s easy to assemble aesthetics instead of creating something from the ground up. It’s tempting to lean on shock, nostalgia, or deep-sounding themes to give the illusion of meaning.
And if that’s all we ever value, if we keep mistaking performance for substance, then the creative landscape will keep filling up with forgettable work.
But it doesn’t have to be this way.
Every decision, what we create, what we support, what we elevate, determines what kind of work thrives.
We can let aesthetics dictate meaning, or we can demand something deeper.
We can reward the illusion of originality, or we can push for the real thing.
We can consume mindlessly, or we can choose to engage with work that actually holds weight.
This isn’t about asking for better.
It’s about choosing better.
Because, in the end, the creative landscape reflects what we allow.
The question is: What are we actually allowing?
Feeling good and ready to execute? Let's get started on your next photography project.
Click the link above to begin!
